Scan report
adminlove520 / Poc-Monitor_v1.0.1
Could an attacker exploit mistakes in this code?
Minor issues. Worth a glance, unlikely to be urgent.
- High
- 2
- Medium
- 0
- Low
- 0
Sources: Bandit, Semgrep, pip-audit
Does this code look like it is trying to cause harm?
No issues of this kind were found.
- High
- 0
- Medium
- 0
- Low
- 0
Sources: YARA, ClamAV, GuardDog, dependency checker
- Likely real
- 2
- Uncertain
- 0
- Likely noise
- 0
The risk classifier rates every finding for how likely it is to be a real issue. Likely noise still counts, just much less.
What we found, in plain English
The repository has been checked and found to have a very low overall risk score of 20.0, which means the code itself is safe from malicious intent and does not contain hidden traps or dangerous patterns. The only thing that was flagged is a Facebook OAuth detection issue, which appears twice in the code and is highly likely to be a mistake rather than a real security problem. This finding is considered ordinary insecure coding because it involves using an API incorrectly instead of being intentionally harmful, so it does not need to be fixed immediately. You can safely use this project for your work without worrying about malicious behavior or critical vulnerabilities.
Written by a local language model from the findings below. The risk scores come from the classifier, not from this summary.
Detections by engine
Findings
Highest severity first. Select a finding to see the code and what it means.
-
- Engine
- Semgrep · Pattern-based code analysis
- Counts towards
- Vulnerability
- File
- /2023/metadata.json line 1
- Likely real
- Yes, 99% confidence
Facebook OAuth detected
requires login -
- Engine
- Semgrep · Pattern-based code analysis
- Counts towards
- Vulnerability
- File
- /dateLog/2023-01-10.json line 1
- Likely real
- Yes, 99% confidence
Facebook OAuth detected
requires login
No findings match these filters.