Scan report

samratashok / nishang

Vulnerability Low

Could an attacker exploit mistakes in this code?

5 risk score

Minor issues. Worth a glance, unlikely to be urgent.

High
1
Medium
0
Low
0

Sources: Bandit, Semgrep, pip-audit

Malicious pattern High

Does this code look like it is trying to cause harm?

40 risk score

Serious issues. Review the high-severity findings before using it.

High
19
Medium
0
Low
0

Sources: YARA, ClamAV, GuardDog, dependency checker

Findings overview
20 total findings
Likely real
4
Uncertain
2
Likely noise
14

The risk classifier rates every finding for how likely it is to be a real issue. Likely noise still counts, just much less.

What we found, in plain English

The repository has two distinct security risks: a low vulnerability score of 5.0 indicates that the code contains some insecure patterns, but these are likely just standard mistakes rather than intentional attacks. However, the high malicious-pattern score of 40.0 is concerning because it suggests the code may be intentionally designed to bypass security checks or hide malicious behavior. The most serious findings involve PowerShell scripts that execute dangerous commands like remote shell access and process injection, which are strong indicators of malware rather than routine development errors. While some rules flagged as potentially normal were actually used in legitimate applications, the presence of these specific high-confidence detections means the code should not be trusted without further investigation.

Written by a local language model from the findings below. The risk scores come from the classifier, not from this summary.

Detections by engine

  • YARA 16

    Malware signature rules · Malicious pattern

  • ClamAV 3

    Antivirus engine · Malicious pattern

  • Semgrep 1

    Pattern-based code analysis · Vulnerability

Score over time

Overall score each time this repository was scanned.

Findings

Highest severity first. Select a finding to see the code and what it means.