Scan report

JustVugg / colibri

Vulnerability Medium

Could an attacker exploit mistakes in this code?

51 risk score

Real issues worth reviewing before you rely on this code.

High
0
Medium
39
Low
116

Sources: Bandit, Semgrep, pip-audit

Malicious pattern Medium

Does this code look like it is trying to cause harm?

19 risk score

Real issues worth reviewing before you rely on this code.

High
10
Medium
5
Low
9

Sources: YARA, ClamAV, GuardDog, dependency checker

Findings overview
179 total findings
Likely real
15
Uncertain
24
Likely noise
140

The risk classifier rates every finding for how likely it is to be a real issue. Likely noise still counts, just much less.

What we found, in plain English

The repository JustVugg/colibri shows a medium vulnerability score of 51.0, which means there are several insecure coding patterns that an attacker could potentially exploit if the code is used in production. While some issues appear to be malicious attempts to hide credentials or evade security checks, many others look like ordinary mistakes made by developers who forgot to pin specific library versions or use weak passwords. The scan also identified 179 total findings, with several high-priority alerts pointing to hardcoded secrets and unsafe file access methods that need immediate attention before the code can be deployed safely.

Written by a local language model from the findings below. The risk scores come from the classifier, not from this summary.

Detections by engine

  • Bandit 155

    Python security linter · Vulnerability

  • YARA 17

    Malware signature rules · Malicious pattern

  • Dependency checker 7

    CVEs, typosquats and risky installs · Supply chain

Score over time

Overall score each time this repository was scanned.

Findings

Highest severity first. Select a finding to see the code and what it means.