Scan report

goruck / home-generative-agent

Vulnerability Medium

Could an attacker exploit mistakes in this code?

61 risk score

Real issues worth reviewing before you rely on this code.

High
0
Medium
24
Low
13

Sources: Bandit, Semgrep, pip-audit

Malicious pattern Safe

Does this code look like it is trying to cause harm?

0 risk score

No issues of this kind were found.

High
0
Medium
0
Low
0

Sources: YARA, ClamAV, GuardDog, dependency checker

Findings overview
37 total findings
Likely real
36
Uncertain
1
Likely noise
0

The risk classifier rates every finding for how likely it is to be a real issue. Likely noise still counts, just much less.

What we found, in plain English

This repository has a medium vulnerability score of 61.0, which indicates that there are several insecure coding patterns in the code that an attacker could potentially exploit. The scan found two services running with writable root filesystems, meaning they could theoretically be used to download or modify files if someone gains access to them. Additionally, the code contains multiple hardcoded passwords and secrets that should never be stored in plain text, which is a common mistake in insecure coding rather than evidence of malicious intent. While the scan did not find any signs of intentional malware, these security issues need to be addressed before the code can be considered safe for production use.

Written by a local language model from the findings below. The risk scores come from the classifier, not from this summary.

Detections by engine

  • Semgrep 24

    Pattern-based code analysis · Vulnerability

  • Bandit 13

    Python security linter · Vulnerability

Score over time

Overall score each time this repository was scanned.

Findings

Highest severity first. Select a finding to see the code and what it means.